The Phenomena of Sarah Palin, Christine O’Donnell & Ann Coulter

December 29, 2010 at 12:48 pm 9 comments

Sarah Palin in Savannah, Georgia, Dec 1, 2008 ...

Image via Wikipedia

Ann Coulter is nothing new. I just thought I’d throw her into the mix. What do all three of these women have in common? They are all politically conservative to the extreme. They all have a habit of saying stupid and/or offensive things. In the case of Coulter, you can’t call her stupid; she’s just offensive. What else do they have in common? They’re all “fuckworthy.”

Let’s face it. Coulter is the only one of the three who actually knows what the hell she’s talking about, and her ideals are so conservative that they make Senator Joseph McCarthy look liberal. She repeatedly insults people and makes offensive comments to get her “points” across. For instance, she once said that she thought this country would be better off if women had never been given the right to vote (because women have a tendency to vote Democrat).

Palin is the Alaska governor who rose to prominence after John McCain picked her to be his running mate in the 2008 Presidential elections. What were her qualifications? Well, she was the governor of Alaska, for less than one full term. And she was once the mayor of a small town in Alaska. She was dogged with controversy; Troopergate, etc. She knows nothing about the issues and even less about foreign policy, and she doesn’t WANT to learn anything about them, preferring instead to run on a platform of “common sense.” McCain seemed to be saying with his choice that he preferred to run on a platform of “sexy.” Why not? We Americans seem to prefer sex to substance.

O’Donnell is even more curious, with her appearances on Bill Maher’s old talk show Politically Incorrect and talking about dabbling in witchcraft. The only things I know about her is that she’s a conservative right wing Christian who considers herself born again. Also, she seems to have been a tad misleading about her educational past. Finally, she doesn’t believe in masturbation. I wonder how she’s planning to enforce that.

I don’t think that any of these three women would have ever gotten any attention at all if it hadn’t been for the fact that they are all three uncommonly attractive. Palin, O’Donnell and Coulter all look like they could have easily stepped off the cover of Playboy magazine. Let’s face it. No one in the American media would pay them the least little bit of attention, least of all the ridiculous O’Donnell, if they weren’t photogenic and if some guy didn’t want to nail them. Don’t knock masturbation, O’Donnell. You owe your entire political career to it.

Can’t we please find some Victoria’s Secret model that will embrace the cause of liberal politics? Anyone?


Entry filed under: Celebrity, Current Events, Politics, Social Commentary, Women's Rights. Tags: , , , , , , , .

The Bet The Post In Which I Eat Crow

9 Comments Add your own

  • […] link: The Phenomena of Sarah Palin, Christine O'Donnell & Ann Coulter … Share and […]

  • 2. popsdumonde  |  December 31, 2010 at 3:18 am

    First time I saw Sarah Pailn, I thought she was pretty. Then I heard her talk and I couldn’t see the pretty through the stupid.
    I’m not sure I share your assessment of these there’s looks, maybe I need different glasses.

    • 3. popsdumonde  |  January 1, 2011 at 12:44 am

      How my “smart phone” came up with ‘there’s’ instead of ‘others’ is beyond me.

  • 4. shorething  |  December 31, 2010 at 8:57 pm

    I’d do any of them and you can do rosie or joy if you could get it up

    • 5. gooseberrybush  |  January 1, 2011 at 12:30 am

      I think maybe you’ve missed the actual point of my post, but congratulations! I knew someone would make a comment like this.

      For the record, the point was that it would be nice if the politically conservative could find a media mascot with some intelligence who’s capable of making a point without being insulting, regardless of her attractiveness. The View is a good case in point. Their token conservative, Hasselbeck, is definitely “fuckworthy” but hardly noteworthy for her brains.

    • 6. popsdumonde  |  January 1, 2011 at 12:48 am

      When terms like “fuckworthy” are used, idiots respond.

  • 7. Amanda  |  January 3, 2011 at 6:46 pm

    This is funny to me as I was watching Rachel Maddow the other day and wondering the very same thing about Liberal Dems.

    • 8. gooseberrybush  |  January 4, 2011 at 1:12 am

      You are right. It’s funny. And I can see how Rachel Maddow would be offensive. I love Al Franken, but he goes too far as well, as does Michael Moore, even though I usually agree with their views on principle.

      • 9. Terri Schaivo  |  January 14, 2011 at 10:07 pm

        These three have so much in common. Neither Palin nor Coulter level anything except personal insults. They are not about policy or substance.
        Palin, Bachmann, Coulter, and O’Donnell are mentally insane, dominionist religious right, offensive bimbos as well.
        Although Coulter really isn’t that attractive to most. Adams apple. More attractive than Janet Reno, though.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Blog Stats

  • 181,412 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 82 other followers

December 2010
« Nov   Jan »

%d bloggers like this: